Re: Sun T2000
- From: "Alexander Fatkulin" <afatkulin@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:01:58 +1100
Kevin,
thanks for the question. There were no PIO involved.
Here is what I see:
create table t as
select mod(level, 10) m10,
mod(level, 25) m25,
mod(level, 50) m50,
level l
from dual
connect by level <= 500000;
Proliant results:
select m10, m25, m50, sum(l), count(*), min(l), max(l), avg(l)
from t
group by m10, m25, m50
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 1 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 5 0.69 0.67 0 649 0 50
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 7 0.69 0.67 0 650 0 50
T2000 results:
select m10, m25, m50, sum(l), count(*), min(l), max(l), avg(l)
from t
group by m10, m25, m50
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 2 4.45 4.34 0 649 0 50
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 4 4.45 4.34 0 649 0 50
Both DB were created with a 16K blocksize. And mind that - Proliant
were running with use_indirect_data_buffers=true.
On 3/25/07, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
of the T2000 server
vs Proliant DL380 G3 (based on 3Ghz Xeons).
One Niagara core were approximately 7 to 8 times slower than single
Xeon CPU in batch task (huge sorts/aggregates) -
...I'm not syaing you didn't see this result, but that seem slower than
expected. To what degree was I/O a factor?
--
Alexander Fatkulin
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
- 10g RAC Install with Raw Devices
- From: Carlson, Todd
- References:
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Lawie, Duncan
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
Other related posts:
- » Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
of the T2000 server vs Proliant DL380 G3 (based on 3Ghz Xeons). One Niagara core were approximately 7 to 8 times slower than single Xeon CPU in batch task (huge sorts/aggregates) - ...I'm not syaing you didn't see this result, but that seem slower than expected. To what degree was I/O a factor?
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
- 10g RAC Install with Raw Devices
- From: Carlson, Todd
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Lawie, Duncan
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson