Re: Sun T2000
- From: "Alexander Fatkulin" <afatkulin@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:09:48 +1100
Looks like the cache subsystem of the T2000 is pretty good so the
local (in relation to a cache) algorithms can benefit.
Thanks to Kevin Closson - my theory about what it's the Niagara cache
that helps it out was wrong.
declare
l_x dual.dummy%type;
begin
for i in 1 .. 500000
loop
select dummy into l_x from dual;
end loop;
end;
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.01 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 133.29 134.92 0 0 0 1
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 2 133.30 134.92 0 0 0 1
Pretty much the same numbers as from my "lookup-table" tests.
--
Alexander Fatkulin
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Lawie, Duncan
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
Other related posts:
- » Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
Looks like the cache subsystem of the T2000 is pretty good so the local (in relation to a cache) algorithms can benefit.
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Lawie, Duncan
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin