RE: Server Architecture

  • From: Tanel Poder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 00:10:02 +0800

If you want fine grained accounting and resource scheduling for your
instances on solaris 10 boxes, then the novel way would be using Solaris
containers for Oracle. This is supported for non-RAC databases only though
Tanel Poder <> 



From: Tanel Poder [mailto:tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 00:06
To: 'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: Server Architecture

One good reason for separate sets of binaries is patching and patch testing
on one database without affecting others. 
Having all installations under different Unix users (and also groups in this
case!) may be better for security but will make the everyday maintenance,
refreshes etc probably harder... as you'll have various problems with
permissioning and file access, need to constantly su between users,
chmod/chown files etc... that's unless you want to chmod 777 all your
directories & files, which would heavily go against the security principles
I know quite many shops which use a separate software installation (and set
of database directories) for each database and it works well. You need to do
more manual work for applying patches for all software installations (unless
you use automatic provisioning of some sort), but you win in flexibility to
patch/upgrade only selected databased in the server instead of all.
Regarding different users for each database - this may be useful if you want
fine-grained separation of duties - by database. However this approach will
be useless if all your DBAs have access to all accounts anyway, in this case
you will just make your life harder without gaining any benefit. So you
should figure out if you really need all your Oracle installations under
different unix usernames and whether the benefit outweighs the maintenance

Other related posts: