RE: Server Architecture
- From: "Goulet, Dick" <richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Matthew Zito" <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx>, <satheeshbabu.s@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:05:13 -0500
IF you have to patch one instance and not apply that patch to all of
them, then you can create a new Oracle_Home at that time. But in my
experience if you have to patch one, you need to patch them all as they
all suffer from the same flaw.
______________________________________________________________
Dick Goulet / Capgemini
North America P&C / East Business Unit
Senior Oracle DBA / Hosting
Office: 508.573.1978 / Mobile: 508.742.5795 / www.capgemini.com
<http://www.capgemini.com>
Fax: 508.229.2019 / Email: richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
45 Bartlett St. / Marlborough, MA 01752
Together: the Collaborative Business Experience
______________________________________________________________
________________________________
From: Matthew Zito [mailto:mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 1:41 PM
To: Goulet, Dick; andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx; satheeshbabu.s@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Server Architecture
The point about clustering and patching is well-taken, though. What do
you do if you need to patch one instance separately from the others, for
whatever reason?
Matt
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Goulet, Dick
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 12:19 PM
To: andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx; satheeshbabu.s@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Server Architecture
Sounds like a SAP installation to me. Tell consultant to go fly a kite.
One set of binaries, 5 instances out of the same home. No options.
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential
and is the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the
person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate,
distribute, or use this message or any part thereof. If you receive this
message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete all
copies of this message.
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized
to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or
any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
- References:
- Server Architecture
- From: Satheesh Babu.S
- Re: Server Architecture
- From: Andrew Kerber
- RE: Server Architecture
- From: Goulet, Dick
- RE: Server Architecture
- From: Matthew Zito
Other related posts:
- » Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » RE: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- » Re: Server Architecture
- Server Architecture
- From: Satheesh Babu.S
- Re: Server Architecture
- From: Andrew Kerber
- RE: Server Architecture
- From: Goulet, Dick
- RE: Server Architecture
- From: Matthew Zito