Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 20:50:02 -0500
Multiple RAC databases on two nodes? Sure, we run 55+ RAC databases on
high end IBM servers. Shared storage for each and one instance per
node.
Works fine. Why would that be not-logical per your original post?
Raj
On 10/30/06, amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry I should have stated clearer.
The customer wants this:
database RAC and CAR in shared storage
instance rac1 and car1 in srv1, instance rac2 and car2 in srv2
Obviously rac1 and rac2 forms RAC and car1 and car2 forms CAR. Not very
logical in my opinion, seems like others think so.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- References:
- Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: Anurag Verma
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte
Other related posts:
- » Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
Sorry I should have stated clearer. The customer wants this: database RAC and CAR in shared storage instance rac1 and car1 in srv1, instance rac2 and car2 in srv2
Obviously rac1 and rac2 forms RAC and car1 and car2 forms CAR. Not very logical in my opinion, seems like others think so.
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: Anurag Verma
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte