Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 11:09:24 -0500
as I mentioned in one of the previous emails, these 55 dbs are not
production. These are for development's use.
Raj
On 11/1/06, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not RAC expert here but I wonder if you achieve good performance
sharing a couple interconnect (gigabit, infiniband?) between 55 RAC
Databases? The bottleneck I have seen in some customers most of times
are due to interconnect.
...interconnect? how are you measuring that specifically please?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
----------------------------------------------
Got RAC?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: LS Cheng
- RE: Question about RAC
- From: Kevin Closson
Other related posts:
- » Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
Not RAC expert here but I wonder if you achieve good performance
sharing a couple interconnect (gigabit, infiniband?) between 55 RAC
Databases? The bottleneck I have seen in some customers most of times
are due to interconnect.
...interconnect? how are you measuring that specifically please?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: LS Cheng
- RE: Question about RAC
- From: Kevin Closson