Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 06:35:23 +0100
rjamya
there wont be vpart, lpart and such, lets make a bit easier, imagine you
have two small PCs running 2 instance each, 4 instances in total and
supporting 2 RAC Databases, 4 instances shares Memory, CPU, Interconnect. Is
is logical?
you said you run 55 RAC in two nodes but then you say you have a instance
per node....?!
On 10/31/06, rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Multiple RAC databases on two nodes? Sure, we run 55+ RAC databases on
high end IBM servers. Shared storage for each and one instance per
node.
Works fine. Why would that be not-logical per your original post?
Raj
On 10/30/06, amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Sorry I should have stated clearer.
> The customer wants this:
> database RAC and CAR in shared storage
> instance rac1 and car1 in srv1, instance rac2 and car2 in srv2
>
> Obviously rac1 and rac2 forms RAC and car1 and car2 forms CAR. Not very
> logical in my opinion, seems like others think so.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: Alex zeng
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya
- References:
- Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: Anurag Verma
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya
Other related posts:
- » Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
Multiple RAC databases on two nodes? Sure, we run 55+ RAC databases on high end IBM servers. Shared storage for each and one instance per node.
Works fine. Why would that be not-logical per your original post?
Raj
On 10/30/06, amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry I should have stated clearer. > The customer wants this: > database RAC and CAR in shared storage > instance rac1 and car1 in srv1, instance rac2 and car2 in srv2 > > Obviously rac1 and rac2 forms RAC and car1 and car2 forms CAR. Not very > logical in my opinion, seems like others think so.
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: Alex zeng
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya
- Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: Anurag Verma
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya