Re: Question about RAC
- From: "Alex zeng" <junk4trash@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 15:17:23 +0800
*rjamya,*
**
*How many operating systems in one node? Is it one node including one
operating system or **mutiple operating systems?*
**
*Thanks*
**
*Alex*
On 10/31/06, amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
rjamya
there wont be vpart, lpart and such, lets make a bit easier, imagine you
have two small PCs running 2 instance each, 4 instances in total and
supporting 2 RAC Databases, 4 instances shares Memory, CPU, Interconnect. Is
is logical?
you said you run 55 RAC in two nodes but then you say you have a instance
per node....?!
On 10/31/06, rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Multiple RAC databases on two nodes? Sure, we run 55+ RAC databases on
> high end IBM servers. Shared storage for each and one instance per
> node.
>
> Works fine. Why would that be not-logical per your original post?
>
> Raj
>
> On 10/30/06, amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sorry I should have stated clearer.
> > The customer wants this:
> > database RAC and CAR in shared storage
> > instance rac1 and car1 in srv1, instance rac2 and car2 in srv2
> >
> > Obviously rac1 and rac2 forms RAC and car1 and car2 forms CAR. Not
> very
> > logical in my opinion, seems like others think so.
>
--
This is Alex zeng, Skype me: hans9zeng
--The mount is there.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya
- References:
- Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: Anurag Verma
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte
Other related posts:
- » Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
- » RE: Question about RAC
- » Re: Question about RAC
rjamya
there wont be vpart, lpart and such, lets make a bit easier, imagine you have two small PCs running 2 instance each, 4 instances in total and supporting 2 RAC Databases, 4 instances shares Memory, CPU, Interconnect. Is is logical?
you said you run 55 RAC in two nodes but then you say you have a instance per node....?!
On 10/31/06, rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Multiple RAC databases on two nodes? Sure, we run 55+ RAC databases on > high end IBM servers. Shared storage for each and one instance per > node. > > Works fine. Why would that be not-logical per your original post? > > Raj > > On 10/30/06, amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Sorry I should have stated clearer. > > The customer wants this: > > database RAC and CAR in shared storage > > instance rac1 and car1 in srv1, instance rac2 and car2 in srv2 > > > > Obviously rac1 and rac2 forms RAC and car1 and car2 forms CAR. Not > very > > logical in my opinion, seems like others think so. >
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya
- Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: Anurag Verma
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: rjamya
- Re: Question about RAC
- From: amonte