rjamya
there wont be vpart, lpart and such, lets make a bit easier, imagine you
have two small PCs running 2 instance each, 4 instances in total and
supporting 2 RAC Databases, 4 instances shares Memory, CPU, Interconnect. Is
is logical?
you said you run 55 RAC in two nodes but then you say you have a instance
per node....?!
On 10/31/06, rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Multiple RAC databases on two nodes? Sure, we run 55+ RAC databases on
> high end IBM servers. Shared storage for each and one instance per
> node.
>
> Works fine. Why would that be not-logical per your original post?
>
> Raj
>
> On 10/30/06, amonte <ax.mount@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sorry I should have stated clearer.
> > The customer wants this:
> > database RAC and CAR in shared storage
> > instance rac1 and car1 in srv1, instance rac2 and car2 in srv2
> >
> > Obviously rac1 and rac2 forms RAC and car1 and car2 forms CAR. Not
> very
> > logical in my opinion, seems like others think so.
>
