RE: Oracle 13
- From: Iggy Fernandez <iggy_fernandez@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "riyaj.shamsudeen@xxxxxxxxx" <riyaj.shamsudeen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 15:01:38 -0800
I bet it will be Oracle 13c. BTW, pricing for database as a service is now
available at https://cloud.oracle.com/database?tabID=1406491812773.
Iggy
From: riyaj.shamsudeen@xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:50:23 -0800
Subject: Re: Oracle 13
CC: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
(or) be scientific about it, realize that number can't predict the future, and
use 13 :)
Googling version 13 shows that there are precedences:
IMS version 13 libraryEEGLAB rivision history version 13Linux mint maya version
13Windward version 13Firefox version 13Adobe photoshop version 13 etc..
Sorry, I am wearing a party pooper hat today :)
However, it may be Oracle 13B: B for BigData.
Cheers
Riyaj Shamsudeen
Principal DBA,
Ora!nternals - http://www.orainternals.com - Specialists in Performance, RAC
and EBS
Blog: http://orainternals.wordpress.com/
Oracle ACE Director and OakTable member
Co-author of the books: Expert Oracle Practices, Pro Oracle SQL, Expert RAC
Practices 12c. Expert PL/SQL practices
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Mark W. Farnham <mwf@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Maybe 13h (holistic for Oracle marketing and horror for the film). From:
oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of rajendra.pande@xxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 1:40 PM
To: MATT.ADAMS@xxxxxx; Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Oracle 13 Taking about sinister it would be funny to see someone
coming up with some clever “Friday the 13th spoof” on oracle 13 J I guess
something like 13c is not the same as 13. But still all things considered I can
imagine ORACLE coming up with some clever excuse to skip 13. From:
oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Adams, Matthew (GE, Appl & Light)
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 1:33 PM
To: Oracle-L (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Oracle 13 No, roman numerals are definitely the way they should
go here. I want to see Oracle XIII…seems more sinister somehow, which makes
that much more appropriate From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of David Fitzjarrell
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2014 1:02 PM
To: sfaroult@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Oracle-L (E-mail)
Subject: Re: Oracle 13 They could use hex: Oracle D or octal which puts us back
to: Oracle 15 Or maybe binary: Oracle 1101 Maybe use base 9: Oracle 14 Base 11
wouldn't work, though: Oracle 12 How about base 7: Oracle 16 The possibilities
could be endless. David Fitzjarrell
Principal author, "Oracle Exadata Survival Guide" On Thursday, November 6, 2014
8:17 AM, Stéphane Faroult <sfaroult@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I agree with Tim that
it's about marketing and not arithmetic. The
trouble is that nobody can ignore the Chinese market these days, and
Oracle 14 will definitely not do in China (no 14th floor in Hong Kong),
and the Chinese attach even more importance to numbers than westerners.
Will we skip for Oracle 12Rn to Oracle 15? Talk of a "mature" product ...
Stéphane Faroult
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
