Re: Oracle 13

From: Stéphane Faroult <sfaroult@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Oracle-L (E-mail)" <Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 09:13:15 -0600

I agree with Tim that it's about marketing and not arithmetic. Thetrouble is that nobody can ignore the Chinese market these days, andOracle 14 will definitely not do in China (no 14th floor in Hong Kong),and the Chinese attach even more importance to numbers than westerners.Will we skip for Oracle 12Rn to Oracle 15? Talk of a "mature" product ...


Stéphane Faroult
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oracle 13
  - From: David Fitzjarrell

Other related posts:

» Oracle 13- Patrice sur GMail
» Re: Oracle 13- David Fitzjarrell
» Re: Oracle 13- Tanel Poder
» Re: Oracle 13- Hans Forbrich
» Re: Oracle 13- Steve Karam
» Re: Oracle 13- Tim Gorman
» RE: Oracle 13- Iggy Fernandez
» Re: Oracle 13- Tanel Poder
» RE: Oracle 13- Iggy Fernandez
» Re: Oracle 13- Rich Jesse
» RE: Oracle 13- Iggy Fernandez
» RE: Oracle 13- Mark W. Farnham
» Re: Oracle 13- Grant Allen
» Re: Oracle 13- Adric Norris
» Re: Oracle 13 - Stéphane Faroult
» Re: Oracle 13- David Fitzjarrell
» RE: Oracle 13- Adams, Matthew (GE, Appl & Light)
» RE: Oracle 13- rajendra.pande
» RE: Oracle 13- Mark W. Farnham
» Re: Oracle 13- Riyaj Shamsudeen
» RE: Oracle 13- Iggy Fernandez
» Re: Oracle 13- Norman Dunbar
» Re: Oracle 13- Dba DBA
» Re: Oracle 13- Hans Forbrich
» Oracle 13- Patrice sur GMail