RE: Oracle 13
- From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <tim@xxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2014 16:17:12 -0500
Oracle ONE (A New Beginning)
[ no worries about v1 now that is has a near monopoly position ]
subtitled, apologies in advance to JRR T, "One Oracle to rule them all" will
feature management of all levels of reliability of transactions,
persistence lifecycle, and size from the nth generation of Oracle's full
RDBMS all the way out to minimum price per unit of throughput
hardware/software transactions.
Hey, I'm just makin' this up. Larry never calls any more.
mwf
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tim Gorman
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 12:53 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Oracle 13
The reminder about Oracle skipping "v1" is pretty convincing evidence that
there will not be an "Oracle13". It is all about marketing, not adhering to
arithmetic. :-)
On 11/5/14 10:31, David Fitzjarrell (Redacted sender oratune@xxxxxxxxx for
DMARC) wrote:
Shades of SQL Server!!! Blasphemy!!! Of course there will be an Oracle 13;
the only number they've skipped so far is 1 because 2 sounded like a better
version for an initial public release.
Tell me your calendar is still showing April 1st.
David Fitzjarrell
Principal author, "Oracle Exadata Survival Guide"
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 10:08 AM, Patrice sur GMail
<mailto:patrice.boivin@xxxxxxxxx> <patrice.boivin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am wondering whether Oracle will skip 13 the way some apartment buildings
and hotels refuse to have a 13th floor...
The marketing meetings must be pretty funny at this point.
Maybe they will call it Oracle 2015 ?
-- Patrice
My profiles:
<http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#%21/profile.php?id=100000206805521>
Facebook <http://ca.linkedin.com/pub/patrice-boivin/a/933/5a9> LinkedIn
<http://www.twitter.com/PatriceBoivin> Twitter
Signature powered by <http://www.wisestamp.com/email-install> WiseStamp
Other related posts:
