RE: Locally Managed Tablespaces
- From: "Lex de Haan" <lex.de.haan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <rlsmith@xxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:08:03 +0100
... and the aswer is: yes, Oracle will ignore the storage clause when using
LMTs with uniform extent sizes. that is, it will do the math to decide how
many extents are needed initially, based on the storage clause, but that's
it.
cheers,
Lex.
Lex.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Kyte Seminar: http://www.naturaljoin.nl/events/seminars.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Smith, Ron L.
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 20:48
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Locally Managed Tablespaces
We are upgrading an application that uses an external database to set=20
initial table create parameters. =20 I would like to use Locally Manages
tablespaces and Uniform extent=20 sizes, instead of the table create
parameters.=20
My question is, will Locally Manages tablespaces cause Oracle to ignore=20
the table create parameters? (I hope)=20 And, if I have some tables that are
empty, and some that have a million=20 rows, what do I use for an initial
extent size?=20 Do I allocate them all small and let the large tables go
into extents?=20
I don't have the luxury of putting large tables in a separate=20 tablespace.
Everything is in one schema and one tablespace.=20
Hope this is clear.=20
Thanks!=20
Ron=20
Important Notice!!
If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, any use, =
distribution or copying of the message is prohibited.
Please let me know immediately by return e-mail if you have received = this
message by mistake, then delete the e-mail message.
Thank you.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
