RE: Anyone going live with 11.2 in Q1 or Q2?
- From: "Matthew Zito" <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Kellyn Pedersen" <kjped1313@xxxxxxxxx>, <development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:51:51 -0500
Presumably not inspired by these threads, I just saw a note go by from
another customer saying they're getting ready to start rolling out
development 11gR2 instances.
I guess everyone is onboard with the new release.....
Matt
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bobak, Mark
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:39 PM
To: Kellyn Pedersen; development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Anyone going live with 11.2 in Q1 or Q2?
See, that's what you call "job security"... :-)
From: Kellyn Pedersen [mailto:kjped1313@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 12:32 PM
To: development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; ORACLE-L; Bobak, Mark
Subject: RE: Anyone going live with 11.2 in Q1 or Q2?
"Insane DBA raises her hand....raises both hands...." :)
We will be moving all our 10g databases to 11g R2, pretty much no matter
what... It's going to have to involve bugs waaay worse than what we
are now experiencing in 10g to convince my manager NOT to go live with
it.
My smallest environment is 2TB and my largest is 12TB. We utilize heavy
partitioning, parallel server execution and I am soooo looking forward
to some of the new 11g features, (yes, I've been blogging about them...)
The hardware is ordered for my new environment, so I'm just waiting at
this point, but knowing the company I work for, this is going to be a
"faster than I'm comfortable" with implementation and I'm going to have
to be on the top of my game to ensure we make it out alive.
The bugs we run into involve partitioning, group hash by aggregation,
parallel execution, max sort lengths and CBO. I'm hoping to get away
from those, but I know I'm a wishful thinker.... :) The patching for
some of these bugs ended up with situations where the "cure was worse
than the disease" or the work around wasn't even an option for us. I've
found myself tiring of the constant justification for Oracle's
complexity resulting in patches that implement new bugs or having to
wait for special patches from Development for every PSU patch I apply to
then re-apply my one-off patches...
It's only going to get worse, isn't it? :P
Kellyn Pedersen
Multi-Platform DBA
I-Behavior Inc.
http://www.linkedin.com/in/kellynpedersen
www.dbakevlar.blogspot.com <http://www.dbakevlar.blogspot.com/>
"Go away before I replace you with a very small and efficient shell
script..."
--- On Wed, 1/13/10, Bobak, Mark <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Bobak, Mark <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Anyone going live with 11.2 in Q1 or Q2?
To: "development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <development@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 9:16 AM
My preprod is going live in a couple of weeks, and my production should
be going live just before end of Q2.
Oracle 11.2.0.1 RAC on RHEL 5.2.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://us.mc320.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=oracle-l-bounce@freelists.
org> [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://us.mc320.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=oracle-l-bounce@freelists.
org> ] On Behalf Of Martin Bach
Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 10:39 AM
To: ORACLE-L
Subject: Anyone going live with 11.2 in Q1 or Q2?
Dear list members,
the subject line says it all... Anyone planning on going live with 11.2
(single instance/RAC in Q1 or Q2)? What's the experience so far? I have
noticed Mark Bobak's email about server pools and policy managed
databases which makes me think that there might be a fair bit of testing
required :)
Best regards,
Martin
--
Martin Bach
OCM 10g
http://martincarstenbach.wordpress.com
<http://martincarstenbach.wordpress.com/>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
