[optimal] Re: Optos
- From: Jim Perry <jimperry275@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 11:04:11 -0400
Thanks for your input Chris.We'll see how the demo goes!
Jim
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:47 AM, Carlton, Chris [VA] <Chris.Carlton@xxxxxx>
wrote:
> My opinions is that is a device of extremes. Best camera ever in
> terms of light exposure hands down. Great for small pupil’s poor media.
> Very good for wide angle. Doctors love it but they do not have to operate
> it. I hate it for some patients and love it for others.
>
>
>
> On the other side software is very poor. Slow if you are used to
> conventional FA I can work a lot faster on Topcon or HRA. Poor for
> ergonomics I hate entering data on it. I do not like the view on the
> monitor you get while imaging.
>
>
>
> I find the reliability poor. This is from having a demo, getting a new one
> and then experience of the office across the street having 2 in different
> clinics. Service here is poor. This for me would be the deal breaker if it
> was our only devise. The control cord seems to not last very long.
>
>
>
> Chris Carlton
>
> VGH/UBC
>
> Eye Care Center
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Jim Perry
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 07, 2014 7:08 AM
> *To:* optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [optimal] Optos
>
>
>
> Our retinal practice is planning to purchase the Optos 200tx.We will demo
> it for a month,with plans to add it as a second imaging device.We also have
> a Topcon 50dx and 50 ix, which will be moved to our seldom used sattelite
> office.I'd like to know what others experience and opinions are of the
> 200tx. Thanks!
>
Other related posts:
