You can remove the green to some extent while imaging. I usually turn green down and the red up. I have tried removing the head rest. Will have to give removing the cover a try. It is great with children. One of the big problems I have is the poor view compared to other devises while imaging. I can not tell if the something is missed like I can with a Fundus camera or HRA. It is not uncommon for us to have the acute phase indicated wrong. Dense floaters are an issue if you can not get them off the fovea. ________________________________ From: optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:optimal-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steffens, Timothy Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2014 10:12 AM To: optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [optimal] Re: Optos We've had a 200Tx for quite a while here at Kellogg and it's connected to OIS. We love it. It works well on all patients, large, small, small pupils, adults and kids. The youngest we've done is a 9 month old, awake and alert. I regularly take off the blue cover because I get a slightly wider field of view and it's easier to position the patient. You need to watch out for the bump on the lower opening. It can rub against the patient's nose. We also taken off the small head rest band. It not necessary and with it off, allows patient's with larger heads to get into position better. Nasal to temporal images are great but superior and inferior are about 100 degrees. There are enough pixels to zoom into the images too or to send in for the Scientific Exhibit. :) The biggest issue you'll have is positioning and getting lashes out of the way. Unlike a regular fundus camera you can't move it. You need to move the patient's head or chin. Also you only view the patient's pupil until you take the image. Lashes are tough too but with the blue mask off you can get to the lids easier. Angiography is a simple and straight forward and so is FAF. The color images are very green but that's to be expected because it only has a red and green laser. They could add a blue laser but the acquisition time would decrease and you would end up with more lids. A white light laster would just cost to much. Thanks, Tim Steffens From: Jim Perry <jimperry275@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jimperry275@xxxxxxxxx>> Reply-To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:08:03 -0400 To: "optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:optimal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> Subject: [optimal] Optos Our retinal practice is planning to purchase the Optos 200tx.We will demo it for a month,with plans to add it as a second imaging device.We also have a Topcon 50dx and 50 ix, which will be moved to our seldom used sattelite office.I'd like to know what others experience and opinions are of the 200tx. Thanks! ********************************************************** Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues