> > And where it's feasible in practice, they will. The > > simple fact is, what real world IPTV nets end up being > > more similar to cable plants than to your notion of > > TV over the public Internet. Whether for reasons of > > security, QoS concerns, or the nature of the cable > > plant itself. Craig Birkmaier wrote: > > We disagree. > > > So for example, IPTV nets will simply become another > > multichannel gate keeper. This is the reality, not > > the fantasy. Context is everything. Better re-read > > Doc's post, Craig. > > I did. You're the odd man out. Chuckle. At 4:01 PM -0600 2/28/05, John McClenny wrote: > > This makes an IPTV and a MSO network look just about > the same from an application perspective. Perhaps you need to read more carefully, then. > It is going to be EXPENSIVE for the cable guys to > migrate from hundreds of subscribers per loop to the > end game of 25-50 subscribers per loop. If the IPTV net deployed a PON, how many households would share the same passive distribution, and how much less expensive would it be to decrease that number of households? Get it? Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.