[mira_talk] Re: 32-bit version for mira 3.2.1?
- From: Lionel Guy <guy.lionel@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: mira_talk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 07:09:56 +0200
Hi Hanquan,
Thanks for the suggestion, but since there are 24 students in the class, the
64-bit box would just die from the load.
Cheers,
Lionel
On 5 Apr 2011, at 22:45 , Hanquan Liang wrote:
> How about installing 64-bit version in a 64-bit box, and SSH from
> crappy 32-bit teaching computer to run MIRA?
>
> Hanquan
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Lionel Guy <guy.lionel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Not that badly. 3.2.0 will do.
>> Maybe I'll ask again whenever MIRA 4.0 comes out ;)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Lionel
>>
>> On 5 Apr 2011, at 21:55 , Bastien Chevreux wrote:
>>
>>> On Thursday 31 March 2011 11:30:03 Lionel Guy wrote:
>>>> For teaching purposes, I'm using mira on old crappy computers that are
>>>> 32-bit. I wanted to install the latest version of MIRA, but can't find a
>>>> 32-bit version for 3.2.1 nor nor 3.2.1.5. I know mira is not meant to be
>>>> run on old crappy computers, but have you decided not to support 32-bit
>>>> versions anymore?
>>> The download numbers in 2009 and 2010 for the 32 bit versions of MIRA had
>>> already been in sharp decline (fortunately so), so I already had envisaged
>>> letting them run out at some moment or another.
>>> But not really intentionally for the 3.2.1 version, no. But after
>>> installing a new distribution at home, I had not found the time to
>>> re-install VirtualBox, so I didn't do 32 bit versions immediately and then
>>> simply forgot about them.
>>> How badly do you need them?
>>> B.
--
You have received this mail because you are subscribed to the mira_talk mailing
list. For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe, please visit
http://www.chevreux.org/mira_mailinglists.html
Other related posts:
