Eric wrote that Walter (not being a classicist) asked
Not being much of a classicist, the reference escapes me. Where does the paradox initially rear its ugly head?
and answered
I did a little searching. It's my misconstrual of Buridan's thirteenth sophism. A = "I know the compressor shorted to ground is false."
A isn't well formed. 'Is false' refers to a sentence or proposition or statement, namely 'the compressor shorted to ground.' What is known is that the sentence 'the computer shorted to ground' is false. Thus
A (rewritten) isI know that 'the computer shorted to ground' is false, a fancy way of saying, 'I know the computer didn't short to ground.
So there are two sentences, one embedded in the other. A. I know 'the computer shorted to ground' is false. and B. "I know 'the computer shorted to ground' is false." C. The computer shorted to ground. D. I know it.C and D are, of course, different sentences. Peter Geach was fond of posing Buridan's sophismata as if they were items likely to appear on the SAT. Nobody bit.
Robert Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html