[lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: "Andreas Ramos" <andreas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:17:50 -0700
(The Republicans) don't have to vote for Democratic candidates. All they
have to do is sit out or support third-party candidates.
A current article in the New York Review discusses this. The Republican
voters have several issues:
1) Disgust with their politicians. The religious right feels betrayed and
used. They don't like any of the current GOP candidates (a Mormon, a
twice-divorced New Yorker, a moderate Republican, etc.) They stay home and
refuse to vote.
2) Fear at the prospect of a woman or a black man in charge. A woman named
Clinton or a black man whose name rhymes with Osama is like a poke in the
eye of Republicans. It provokes their deepest sexist or racist fears about
the modern world. They may come out to vote against that.
It's going to be an odd election. The GOP has no agenda, asides from "we
don't want anybody". The Democrats have no agenda, asides from "no more
Bush", but Bush will be gone. They could lose the election.
Bush is still in the White House. He may start another war. It's likely he
will attack Iran; he is well on the path. It would lead to a collapse of the
USA in the region. Gasoline could hit $5/gallon or more. Will Americans "be
patriotic and support the troops", or rebel over high gasoline prices and
demand impeachment?
yrs,
andreas
www.andreas.com
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
- References:
- [lit-ideas] The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: Chris Bruce
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- » [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
(The Republicans) don't have to vote for Democratic candidates. All they have to do is sit out or support third-party candidates.
- [lit-ideas] The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: Lawrence Helm
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: John McCreery
- [lit-ideas] Re: The Religious Right Isn't What It Used to Be
- From: Chris Bruce