[lit-ideas] Re: Sunday

  • From: "Veronica Caley" <molleo1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 10:02:31 -0400

Apologies re post on Carter.  I sent it before I read Andy's.

Veronica
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Andy 
  To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 3:41 AM
  Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday


        Carter's debacle presidency?  He was the president who saw things the 
way they really were, that we needed to reduce energy use for example.  The 
perception of debacle is that people don't want to know things the way they 
really are.  They prefer Morning in America, i.e., spend and use it up as fast 
as possible.  Ultimately that became Mourning in America, yet people still 
think Reagan's was a good presidency.  

        Reagan unleashed the genie of debt, not Carter.  Reagan's was the 
debacle presidency, not Carter's.  Yet because Reagan talked everyone into a 
warm fuzzy fantasy and Carter told it like it is, Carter gets the debacle 
stamp.  Emotions rule...


        --- On Tue, 10/21/08, Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

          From: Julie Krueger <juliereneb@xxxxxxxxx>
          Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Sunday
          To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
          Date: Tuesday, October 21, 2008, 5:32 AM


          Points taken (although, who needs TV when there's the internet?).  

          I too, have not experienced any real President during my lifetime.  
But that does not convince me that the individual in office is irrelevant to 
the direction of the country.


          On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Eric Yost <mr.eric.yost@xxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

            >> He too, Eric, feels as though the rep's and dem's are simply two 
pieces of the same party and that it really doesn't matter who is President.  I 
understand that, coming from him, because he is rather highly
            cynical in nature -- but it doesn' t seem as natural coming from 
Eric.


            I haven't had TV for several months and have been insulated from 
the images of agitprop. So it could be that.

            On the other hand, we haven't had an real President during my 
lifetime, so it's hard to get worked up over a silver-tongued, slickster 
machine-politico whose major appeal is the iconic realization of racial 
progress and whose shortcomings have yet to be exposed. I recall Carter coming 
out of nowhere as the shiny new thing and also recall his debacle presidency.

            Yet I am prepared to be pleasantly surprised. A surprise would be 
fine indeed. Maybe "the People" will be friendly? 

            ------------------------------------------------------------------
            To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
            digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html




          -- 
          Julie Krueger

          Visit www.VoteForChange.com. Register to vote and help spread the 
word. 
       

Other related posts: