[lit-ideas] Re: Is Hizbollah a Resistance Organization or not?

  • From: "Stan Spiegel" <writeforu2@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 03:09:23 -0400

Beautifully said, Lawrence. I agree with everything you said, it was said with 
such an appreciation for nuance and meaning.

Except for identifying Andreas with the Leftist / Islamist position. That's 
ridiculous.

 Your descriptions are meaningful and valuable; your evaluations using 
terminology like "Leftist / Islamist position" are intrusive. They blur 
meaning, alienate, and block meaningful discussion.  

Stan Spiegel
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Lawrence Helm 
  To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 1:38 AM
  Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Is Hizbollah a Resistance Organization or not?


  Since Mike asked, I take Andreas note below to be consistent with the 
Leftist/Islamist position.  Hizbollah attacked Israel but that doesn't matter.  
Only the dead matter.  If Israel defends itself it is being a warmonger state.  
This leaves Hizbollah's tactics in tact.  They shouldn't have to pay for their 
adventure.  This view would, if put into effect, prevent Israel from defending 
itself.  Israel is a warmongering state if it defends itself.  



  Note the neutral it is "horrible" that 12 people in "Israel died in rocket 
attacks" but no blame is attached to Hizbollah.  It might as well have been a 
meteor that struck those 12 people.  Islamist Mullahs who sided with America 
after 9/11 thought it horrible that those people died in the Trade Center 
attack, but they stopped well short of assigning blame for the deaths.



  Andreas does do something you don't normally see in Leftist/Islamist 
arguments.  He says there are warmongers in control in Lebanon, Syria and Iran, 
but he does it in such a way that there is moral equivalence between what the 
Islamists do and what Syria, Iran and Lebanon (I assume he means Hizbollah) 
does.  There isn't enough here to see a developed political theory, but 
anarchists blame states and not people for the evils of the world.



  Lawrence



  -----Original Message-----
  From: lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:lit-ideas-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Andreas Ramos
  Sent: Sunday, August 06, 2006 9:23 PM
  To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Is Hizbollah a Resistance Organization or not?



  Lawrence wrote:



  >The Lit-Ideas Leftists aren't as articulate but side with Omar, Syria and 
Hizbollah.  I 

  >haven't seen any of them siding with Israel.



  Lawrence, do you mean whether we side with the Israeli people, or the 
government of Israel?



  Today, 12 people in Israel died in rocket attacks. That's horrible. I side 
with the people 

  in both Israel and Lebanon and  this ridiculous, meaningless war should stop 
instantly.



  I don't side with the warmongers in control of Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Iran, 
and the White 

  House. They are idiots who only care about power and money. All the talk of 
patriotism and 

  defense and peace is just crap that they use to make money and get others to 
die.



  I don't see you siding with the people of the world. You constantly take the 
side of 

  warmongers. Where are you? Constructive peace or endless narcissistic war?



  yrs,

  andreas

  www.andreas.com 


Other related posts: