[lit-ideas] Re: Erin's Course Dilemma
- From: JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:22:10 EST
You guys wake up and get awfully smart awfully late at night.
I used to do that. Well, at least wake up.
God, I hate getting old.
Julie Krueger
last one tonight. maybe
========Original Message======== Subj: [lit-ideas] Re: Erin's Course
Dilemma Date: 1/18/05 9:49:38 P.M. Central Standard Time From:
_mccreery@xxxxxxxx (mailto:mccreery@xxxxxxx) To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on:
On 2005/01/18, at 19:24, Robert Paul wrote:
> "Perhaps the immobility of the things that surround us is forced upon
> them by
> our conviction that they are themselves, and not anything else, _and_
> by the
> immobility of our conceptions of them."
Conception? Or perception?
Is it not a principal lesson of modern science that what we take to be
immobility is only change at a pace to slow for unaided perception to
grasp.
John McCreery
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
