[lit-ideas] Re: Erin's Course Dilemma
- From: Michael Chase <goya@xxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:47:06 +0100
Le 17 janv. 05, =E0 19:41, Phil Enns a =E9crit :
> Michael Chase, after a brief review of Carlo Ginzburg's _Rapports de=20=
> force.
> Histoire, rhetorique,preuve_ wrote:
>
> "Comments?"
>
> Sure. Niether Nietzsche nor Derrida denied truth,
M.C. : I'll leave Derrida to those who know his work better than =
I do.=20
But as far as Freddie N. is concerned=A0:
There exists neither spirit, nor reason, nor thinking, nor=20
consciousness, nor soul, nor will, nor truth (Will to power, trans.=20
Kaufmann-Hollingdale, =A7 480)
A powerful seduction fights on our behalf, the most powerful =
that=20
there has ever been - the seduction of truth - "Truth"? Who forced this=20=
word on me=A0? But I repudiate it=A0; but I disdain this proud word=A0: =
no,=20
we do not not even need this : we shall conquer and come to power even=20=
without truth. (WTP =A7 749)
No, this bad taste, this will to truth, to =93=A0truth at all =
costs=A0=94,=20
this adolescent madness in the love of truth =96 we=92ve had enough of =
it=A0:=20
for that, we are too experienced, too serious, too joyous, too=20
weatherbeaten, too profound (Gay science, Preface, =A7 4, my=20
translation).
Etc., etc.
Best, Mike.
>
Michael Chase
(goya@xxxxxxxxxxx)
CNRS UPR 76
7, rue Guy Moquet
Villejuif 94801
France
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
