Fine, except what does the pre-television era have to offer? More sleep maybe, because there was no electricity. Other than that, what? Less war? Less child abuse? Was everyone spaced out on laudanum maybe? Is that what made it good? They executed pre-teenaged children for stealing clothes in the good old days. Specifics, please, of what distinguishes this golden age before television. Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Andy: I hear in this a hankering for the good old days. Well sometimes a bassoon can sound like a foghorn, I guess. But I was addressing John's point that people seldom stray outside their socioeconomic class these days, and fail to identify with anyone who is not precisely ... themself. Part of this failure to understand seems rooted in the way community (a basic human need, not an old-fashioned sentiment) works out. What do people share? Shopping malls maybe, maybe highways. Other than that, our galvanizing community seems to consist of TV. Everyone knows the jingles to ads and the feisty TV characters who reflect ... the viewers. Our lowest common denominator. ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html --------------------------------- Want to be your own boss? Learn how on Yahoo! Small Business.