[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
- From: David Ritchie <ritchierd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 22:03:00 -0800
On Nov 27, 2006, at 9:30 PM, Robert Paul wrote:
Robert Paul,
messing about with words, under threatening skies,
somewhere south of Reed College.
Hereabouts I noticed, when I was just walking the dog, that cars are
moving very slowly indeed. This may be related to the fact that the
roads are unusually shiny. I diagnose a dose of freezing rain, or just
plain old ice. Today's lunchtime hailstorm was impressive, loud enough
to drown out people discussing their experience of our college's new
summer trip to Tokyo. In an art school such drownings are not long
mourned; words are ephemeral but visuals are said to linger.
Nowhere was this clearer to me today than in a thesis proposal
presentation. Not only did the student talk in half sentences; the
interrogating faculty did so too.
"Questioning gender identity issues?"
"The video part and the daguerrotype piece...I don't see how the two
connect...Can you comment more?"
"In the beginning the daguerrotype idea was important but now with the
projection idea, models may not be all that important and it will
depend if I explore..."
I wanted to say, "Shouldn't we know exactly who is hitting whom at the
outset?" But instead I asked, "In the days of Victorian explorers
everyone knew what the expedition's aim was. If you succeed, if you
reach your goal, what will you have discovered?" The answer was that
gender identity issues will have been questioned.
Let us pray that no teeth are harmed in this coming interrogation.
David Ritchie,
(Founding Member, Society for the Abolition of Acronyms and the
Preservation of Spoken Sentences, SAAPSS)
Portland, Oregon
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
