[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)

From: Phil Enns <phil.enns@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 07:50:29 -0400

Andreas Ramos wrote:

"Are these African swans or European swans?"

Are the African swans migratory?  Because if they aren't, they couldn't have
brought the coconut.


On a quest,

Phil Enns
Glen Haven, NS
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html

References:

[lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
From: Andreas Ramos

Other related posts:

» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)
» [lit-ideas] Re: Back to Popper (and further back to Hume)