[lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: jimkandjulieb@xxxxxxx
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:04:55 -0400
<< I mean _DOS_ Flounder? What are the implications?>>
There are SO many levels.......where to start.....?
Julie Krueger
-----Original Message-----
From: pas@xxxxxxxx
To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 8:50 AM
Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
>Mr Geary said: I assure you, Chris, Julie was being ironic. I laughed out
>>loud at her post.
I laughed too.
>I wonder who Josie Wells really is. He's too cartoon to be real.
The scariest thing is that someone who "writes"? like he does, apparently works
in a university's WRITING department. It's also interesting that when he's
spewing hatred, his writing gets somewhat more like what some might call
English. Most times, he resembles a character from Zappa's ThingFish.
> Come clean, Irene -- how many are you?
I'm convinced that Jack Spratt is a new incarnation Joe Louie Spermanza. I mean
_DOS_ Flounder? What are the implications?
casting,
Paul
##########
Paul Stone
pas@xxxxxxxx
Kingsville, ON, Canada
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
________________________________________________________________________
Check out AOL.com today. Breaking news, video search, pictures, email and IM.
All on demand. Always Free.
- References:
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: jimkandjulieb
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Chris Bruce
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Paul Stone
Other related posts:
- » [lit-ideas] Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- » [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: jimkandjulieb
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Chris Bruce
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Mike Geary
- [lit-ideas] Re: Another Bush failure?
- From: Paul Stone