On Sun, 8 Feb 2004 08:09:37 -0600 eeemailer@xxxxxxxx writes: [...]So it seems that it IS the phone number which is > culprit > here, not the account #? And THAT seems just to weird to me. [...] Arbitrary abuse of Juno free and paid customers based on usage had happened in the past, and a class action suit resulted which is being paid off. for what little that might be worth. I doubt such would deliberately happen in the present or the future, after this suit As I understand it, free users are limited to 10 hours per month, then all they can get is their e-mail but no Internet connection time. Paid users are given "unlimited access"--as far as I know, read your terms of service for details. If it is the case that some user using some number[s] can actually exceed the 10 hour usage, if this really happens, it is likely due to Juno/UO technical or other means failing to operate in that circumstance. It could be, for example, due to the particular connection from the user, through the phone system, etc causing the hours accounting system not to update. In the "golden era" of 1997-2000, variations of this sort of thing was called DUNning--technical means to circumvent the regulation of ISP systems in varying manners--and it became a somewhat popular sport, had several discussion groups, etc. If such things became unusually prevalent in a given circumstance, the usual procedure by the ISP affected was either to change the system architecture or software, or attempt to suppress free discussion of the existing loopholes by coming down upon the group providers. I doubt much discussion of specific technical means would find a happy home in this particular group. If such things still exist, I'd imagine it is more underground. thepccat To unsubscribe, send a message to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe juno_accmail" in the body or subject. OR visit //freelists.org ~*~