[Ilugc] Notes of CDs4Grab Wiki page
- From: cyborg4k@xxxxxxxxx (Shakthi Kannan)
- Date: Fri Nov 26 14:00:21 2004
Hi Sridhar,
Thanks for your reply.
--- Sridhar R <sridharinfinity@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
You misunderstood. I said, if suppose if A resides
in Royapuram and B
resides in Washermenpet, A must be listed under
Royapuram but NOT also
on Washermenpet.
If A is willing to help Washermenpet residents, why
should we say no?
The same goes for B. Suppose if C
also resides in
Washermetpet, under 'Washermenpet' we have 2 entries
- B, C. but not A
just because that A is nearby it.
You can specify A too if he is willing to travel to
the area and provide the service AND if B and C don't
have all the CDs or they are not in station.
Now suppose under location X, A and B are listed
according to your
recommendation. A is listed because he resides in
X. B is listed
because X is nearby his area. Now a person in X
wants some CDs to be
written. Sure, he can approach A or B for that. It
is just *or*. I
can make some decisions like to contact the *most*
nearby person. But
he is not sure.
Let the person contact and find out. We needn't make
any assumptions, right?
The term "nearby" refers to where the maintainer can
lend his CDs to. If A wants to service locations P
(residence) and Y (work place) and if P and Y are far
away places, you are suggesting that A be assigned to
P only. But, when A is willing to service Y, why
should we say no?
Regards,
K Shakthi
=====
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
K Shakthi
Specsoft (Hexaware Technologies), ASIC Design Center
http://www.geocities.com/shakthimaan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com ;
Other related posts:
