[ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update
- From: "Paul Fernando" <prfernan@xxxxxxxx>
- To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2006 21:09:17 -0500 (EST)
Another update.
On Wed, February 8, 2006 8:26 pm, Paul Fernando wrote:
> It was a minor bug after all.
>
> On Wed, February 8, 2006 7:56 pm, Muranyi, Arpad wrote:
>> One more thing, it seems that the Verilog and VHDL
>> sides do the same thing as far as the ordering
>> problem goes, I may have gotten confused about that
>> when I was rushing to my meeting...
>>
>> Arpad
>> ====================================================
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Muranyi, Arpad
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:55 PM
>> To: 'prfernan@xxxxxxxx'
>> Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update
>>
>> Paul,
>>
>> Forgot to mention that in this version I started to see
>> messages in the DOS window about "Swapped ... " which
>> you should turn off. I am not interested in seeing this
>> (seems to be a debug feature you put in there) and it
>> sounds a little scary for the novice...
>>
>> Arpad
>> ========================================================
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Muranyi, Arpad
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 4:53 PM
>> To: 'prfernan@xxxxxxxx'
>> Subject: RE: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update
>>
>> Paul,
>>
>> Please try the attached file. Just to reiterate,
>> r1 should have the table that has a LOWER Vfixture
>> value than the table that goes into r2, and f1
>> should have the table that has a HIGHER Vfixture
>> than the table that goes into f2.
>>
>> Interestingly, when I used the buffers in the lab_1.ibs
>> file, the order was correct. From this I suspect that
>> your compare does something differently depending on
>> whether Vfixture is equal to the supply voltages compared
>> when it is something else (which is what this test file
>> does).
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Arpad
>> ====================================================-----Original
>> Message-----
>> From: ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:ibis-macro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf
>> Of Paul Fernando
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 3:57 PM
>> To: ibis-macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [ibis-macro] Re: IBIS-to-AMS script update
>>
>> I fixed #2.
>> I can't recreate #1. And like you said, its odd that this is happening.
>> Could you give
>> me a sequence to re-create the condition?
>>
>
Other related posts:
