Agreed. I just don't want to disappear down a rabbit hole of designing all of the B* classes that *could* exist in a support kit of the future. :-) I think that, in the future, there may well be a place for some more classes (BDateTime, for example) to exist in the support class. Michael >As the person who started this mess, I do believe this has been a fruitful >thread. I post what I thought were bugs in the BString class and this >discussion has shown that they are not the bugs I thought - I was using the >class wrong - and the features I did want need to be defined in a totally >separate class. Live and learn - BString is fine as it is except for one >weird bug pointed out by someone else. > > Earl Colby Pottinger > >>Interesting as this may be, it really doesn't fall under the realm of R1. :-/ >>I know. There are *so* many places we would all like to improve things. >>Trust me - screen saver and the kernel both have them. :-) >>All the more reason to get the stuff done that we have to for R1 so that >>we can start planning R2. :-) > >