[openbeos] Re: BString

  • From: "Michael Phipps" <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 21:09:47 -0500

Agreed. I just don't want to disappear down a rabbit hole of designing all of 
the B* classes that *could* exist in a support kit of the future. 
I think that, in the future, there may well be a place for some more classes 
(BDateTime, for example) to exist in the support class. 


>As the person who started this mess, I do believe this has been a fruitful 
>thread.  I post what I thought were bugs in the BString class and this 
>discussion has shown that they are not the bugs I thought - I was using the 
>class wrong - and the features I did want need to be defined in a totally 
>separate class.  Live and learn - BString is fine as it is except for one 
>weird bug pointed out by someone else.
>                 Earl Colby Pottinger
>>Interesting as this may be, it really doesn't fall under the realm of R1. :-/
>>I know. There are *so* many places we would all like to improve things.
>>Trust me - screen saver and the kernel both have them. :-)
>>All the more reason to get the stuff done that we have to for R1 so that
>>we can start planning R2. :-)

Other related posts: