[openbeos] Re: BString
- From: "Michael Phipps" <mphipps1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2001 21:09:47 -0500
Agreed. I just don't want to disappear down a rabbit hole of designing all of
the B* classes that *could* exist in a support kit of the future.
:-)
I think that, in the future, there may well be a place for some more classes
(BDateTime, for example) to exist in the support class.
Michael
>As the person who started this mess, I do believe this has been a fruitful
>thread. I post what I thought were bugs in the BString class and this
>discussion has shown that they are not the bugs I thought - I was using the
>class wrong - and the features I did want need to be defined in a totally
>separate class. Live and learn - BString is fine as it is except for one
>weird bug pointed out by someone else.
>
> Earl Colby Pottinger
>
>>Interesting as this may be, it really doesn't fall under the realm of R1. :-/
>>I know. There are *so* many places we would all like to improve things.
>>Trust me - screen saver and the kernel both have them. :-)
>>All the more reason to get the stuff done that we have to for R1 so that
>>we can start planning R2. :-)
>
>
Other related posts:
