On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 2012-08-22 at 05:04:59 [+0200], Joseph Prostko <joe.prostko@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: >> I was in a >> bad car wreck last Monday, and am finally getting back into the swing >> of things. > I hope everything's OK (besides the car, obviously). Yeah, I'm alright now. I got beat up and bruised pretty bad from the impact, so I was pretty sore for quite some time. As a lesson for the future, I shouldn't fall asleep while driving and plow through a utility pole with my car! The car is a total loss, unfortunately, but at least I'm okay and nobody else got hurt. >> Would just using something like the "time" command under identical >> circumstances be what you had in mind, or did you have some more >> sophisticated benchmarking metric in mind? > "time" is fine. Running it more than once to average things would be a good > idea, though. Alright, sounds good. I'll try to get around to doing some testing either later tonight or tomorrow to see if there's any substantial differences as a result of the the different optimization levels. - joe