[haiku-development] Re: Segmentation fault building jam on FreeBSD 9.0
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 09:48:11 +0200
On 2012-08-22 at 05:04:59 [+0200], Joseph Prostko <joe.prostko@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> First off, sorry for the delay in getting back to this thread, as I
> see nobody has commented since I was last checking on it. I was in a
> bad car wreck last Monday, and am finally getting back into the swing
> of things.
I hope everything's OK (besides the car, obviously).
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:45 AM, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >> On 14/08/2012 07:26, Fredrik Holmqvist wrote:
> >> > 2012/8/13 Joseph Prostko <joe.prostko@xxxxxxxxx>:
> >> >> Yeah, I think for consistency, either we should use -O in both places,
> >> >> or else -O3 -fno-strict-aliasing. [...]
> >> > IIRC correctly I switched that from -O to -O3 long ago, in the hope
> >> > that it would speed up build times.
>
> > If you build a complete image, a few seconds don't make much of a
> > difference. Most of the time, however, developers only build one or two
> > components repeatedly, so that the jam warm-up time becomes relevant. So
> > some performance measuring would certainly be appreciated.
>
> Would just using something like the "time" command under identical
> circumstances be what you had in mind, or did you have some more
> sophisticated benchmarking metric in mind?
"time" is fine. Running it more than once to average things would be a good
idea, though.
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
