On February 14, 2012 at 12:50 AM Alexander von Gluck <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 13.02.2012 15:36, Axel Dörfler wrote: > > Just to throw in my opinion: I would not just remove the logo (as you > > already did), but also the application > > altogether. It could be an optional package you can install if you need or > > want it, I see little reason why it should > > be part of the base installation. > Hmm, it could be quite useful for forcing software GL if Hardware GL isn't > working. > > As the Gallium stuff tends to be buggy at times on some hardware, making a > friendly interface to force software rendering could be seen as a very > positive thing. > We also will have three software rendering engines to choose from if the > OpenGL work goes well. (swrast, gallium softpipe, gallium llvm) We certainly have, the general user certainly shouldn't have, though. The system should always choose the best for the user; it's too complicated anyway for most users (including myself) to make even an educated guess as to what is the best solution. Bye, Axel.