[haiku-development] Re: Haiku R1/alpha discussion summary (was: Re: Haiku R1/alpha decisions)
- From: Stephan Assmus <superstippi@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 13:21:15 +0200
François Revol <revol@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > There are three methods:
> > 1. Vote, most probably by the development team. There would be a list
> > of proposals, there would be discussion, and finally every member casts
> > a vote. For optima forma, every proposal needs to be backed by a
> > developer that will carry it out (or oversee that it happens). In this
> > scenario, Webkit (for example) will most likely not find an adopter.
> > The DR1 naming will, and then might be voted for or against.
> >
> > 2. Benevolent dictator (team). An individual, or a group, will make
> > some decisions about which key features alpha 1 needs. How they are
> > appointed or selected, is another discussion. In this scenario,
> > whatever the representatives of the free mind agree on, will be a
> > decision.
> >
>
> We could compromise on dictatorship by having ppl with svn commit access
> vote :)
I think this could work.
Best regards,
-Stephan
Other related posts:
