[haiku-development] Re: Haiku R1/alpha discussion summary (was: Re: Haiku R1/alpha decisions)
- From: "François Revol" <revol@xxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2008 12:51:10 +0200 CEST
> There are three methods:
> 1. Vote, most probably by the development team. There would be a list
> of proposals, there would be discussion, and finally every member
> casts a vote. For optima forma, every proposal needs to be backed by
> a
> developer that will carry it out (or oversee that it happens). In
> this
> scenario, Webkit (for example) will most likely not find an adopter.
> The DR1 naming will, and then might be voted for or against.
>
> 2. Benevolent dictator (team). An individual, or a group, will make
> some decisions about which key features alpha 1 needs. How they are
> appointed or selected, is another discussion. In this scenario,
> whatever the representatives of the free mind agree on, will be a
> decision.
>
We could compromise on dictatorship by having ppl with svn commit
access vote :)
François.
Other related posts:
