[geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts? (Supplementary)
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 19:14:40 -0000
Dear James,
I've taken another look at your drawings and your explanation and it would seem
that you have managed to show what a heliocentric annual star trail would look
like - a very nice flower pattern, however that is not what we see do we, we
only see circles. QED?
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: j a
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 4:08 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Is geocentrism supported by facts? (Supplementary)
Paul,
Glad to hear it's not long forgotten. Take your time, your choice of
discussing the axioms involved in formulating one's mindset torwards creation
or evolution was great idea.
Everyone,
Attached is a drawing illustraiting my understanding of what we should see
produced in star trails from the nightly and annual axis of rotation. Since the
baseline (distance from observer to axis of rotation) is so small compared the
distance to the stars, I have basically made it zero length, in order to get
the drawing somewhat to scale. I added a star A to the drawing to help my
imagination, it could be any star that would be very close to the annual axis
of rotation. Finally I made what it should look like if you took 24 nightly
star trail pictures (spaced semi-monthly) and superimposed them on a single
annual star trail. enough nightly star trails superimposed together should form
the outline of the annual.
Your comments please. I want to make sure I understand this and do not have
something basic wrong.
JA...
Other related posts:
