[geocentrism] Re: Further on Aspden
- From: "Robert Bennett" <robert.bennett@xxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 16:22:49 -0400
-----Original Message-----
From: geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:geocentrism-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of philip madsen
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 2:09 AM
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Further on Aspden
Robert it is difficult to answer all of yours when it appears the diagrams
did not get to you in your original copy from me. So I decided to take a
section and represent just this section. by way of explanation of what
Aspden said. If you do not have the full lecture it is here.
http://www.aspden.org/papers/P2002a/Berlin.htm
The important diagram is here:
Most of the rest of your confusion was because you did not get what I am
about to repeat and embellish here.
I have indicated that the gap betwen the plates is a section of a
cylindrical capacitor. Important for Aspdens experiment to understand how a
rotating component of charge is produced. You asked how is anything
rotating. Note I am not saying the section of aether is rotating, but
components simulated rotation. I did not detail this before because I
assumed you would be aware of how the permanent magnet simulated a solenoid.
But to regress and simplify for the permanent magnet . Consider the iron
rod, and look at it beside the standard text book inductance diagram
detailing how the individual turns with their circular magnetic fields
combine to give the standard rod permanent magnetic field structure. . We
are told that the molecules are so arranged in the steel that certain atomic
electrons are all rotating in the same direction around their nuclei such
that they are all in the same direction around the periphery of the rod.
This occurs longitudinally as well. Thus you can picture a graphical
representation that is similar to a movement of electrons through the turns
and the magnetic field in a coil. The electrons do not move from atom to
atom. but the partial section of every orbit of each atom is sufficient to
cause a field just as though a DC electrical currrent were flowing.
If a circle of people raised their negatively charged hands waist high to
the left, moved them to the right , dropped them and repeated it all in
unison, they would simulate a current around the circle and really magnetise
it.
Now back to the diagram above. Notice how the aether dipole which is
normally balanced as shown outside of the capacitor, is off balance on the
one inside of the capacitor plates. All of these "aether units" of rotating
negative electrical charges between the plates are strained in their orbits
towards the high + voltage on the upper plate.
Next it is assumed by Aspden that all the negative charges are always
rotating in the same direction, always, normally. Hence under the influence
of the high voltage, we have a lot of protruding orbiting negative charges
all orbiting in the same direction.
Like the electrons in the steel .
In this unbalanced state, you will perceive what appears to be, outside the
normal space of a 'unit of aether' a movement of negative charge to the
right , even though no specific charge ever leaves its positive central
anchor. This happens linearly, but by making the plates into a circular
cylinder, we in affect cause a circular motion of charges, which would look
like a DC current flow of electrons as was simulated in the iron rod
mentioned above.
Because of the arrow shown going in the opposite direction, in his diagrams,
I assume he is indicating that the positive and negative units are separated
and both flow in opposite directions. Although as we have weightless
charges, no inertia is involved, I see a few complicated problems in this.
But who knows yet.
As I said elsewhere, such a flow if it is happening, should exhibit a
magnetic field. Which would be one way of proving the theory.
Is there any energy component of this state? The existance of a magnetic
field would prove yes. I would prefer to expect it to be sourced in the
original HV charging current. Aspden thought different.
Philip.
The proof will be in your re-creation of the experiment.
Good luck and let us know the results.
RB
Other related posts:
