[geocentrism] Re: Further on Aspden
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 22:32:40 +0100
I agree Philip, but for perpetual motion to work, the mechanism must produce
more energy than is lost, hence, under present physics, it is impossible.
However we know that current physics leaves much to be desired!
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 12:34 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Further on Aspden
The examples you cite Philip extract energy whereas the ones mentioned by
Allen create more energy than is put into them. Jack.
Not the way I see it Jack.. Energy cannot be created or destroyed..
All energy, (to do work) is extracted from somewhere or something.
MS tries to ridicule "free energy" by associating it with creation, in the
manner you mentioned, simply because they do not accept or understand the
existence of the aether as a source, as they do see the sun and tides. I
repeat my assertion, nuclear energy once was in the same category as aether is
today.
I do appreciate these "comebacks" Jack, because in forming my answer, I am
sort of self instructing and reinforcing my faith in my own thought processes..
Keeps me young.
Philip.
Other related posts:
