[geocentrism] Re: Evolution
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jack.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:05:18 +0100
Dear Paul,
This illustrates microevolution (variation within the same kind) not
macroevolution (a kind becoming another kind). I have already told you this in
a previous e-mail. What Darwinists say is that because we can see evolutionary
variations within kinds then ergo it should be seen between kinds. This is
wrong reasoning and their are no fossils to back up the assertion.
Jack
----- Original Message -----
From: philip madsen
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2007 10:05 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Evolution
Finally, please do a search for "Apo A-I Milano". My search produced 319,000
hits, the first on my list being
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/33816.php. Other sources I've seen
indicate that all who carry this gene are descended from a single marriage
about 400 years ago. If you do not subscribe to the concept of evolution, how
would you explain this phenomenon?
Paul D
What has geaneology to do with evolution? The church has always recognised
inbreeding as a danger, and forbids it .. Perhaps it is proof of devolution?
Phil.
Other related posts:
