[geocentrism] Re: Challenge
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 22:19:16 +0100
Dear Alan,
Can your brother explain without the use of coincidence or convenience
factors why the pole star describes a circle over the 24 hour rotation of
the Earth but not parallax over the period of a year?
Jack Lewis
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Griffin" <ajg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 3:28 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Challenge
> On 03 Aug, Alan Griffin <ajg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > > On 31st Jul, Steven Jones wrote:
>
> > > The motion of the Earth has never been proven. If your so confident
> > > that it has, then all I ask of you is simply to cite just one example,
> > > which I shall refute with the minimum of effort.
>
> > I saw my brother this evening. He says that the aberration of
> > light proves that the earth moves.
>
> Strange. We have not heard from Stephen Jones, refuting my one
> example "with minimum effort"!
>
> Do you think he has at last realised that here is definite proof
> that the earth is moving?
>
> Alan Griffin
>
>
>
Other related posts:
