Re: [foxboro] P2P links locked
- From: dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx
- To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 15:59:11 +0200
Hi Kevin,
This is what the result of the rsom looked like:
line 0 was a test, lines 1 to 5 show the consecutive compound scanning, as
you can see compound R04 is missing, we assume it's line 8, no response.
I'm not any good with scripts but I suppose it would be possible to run
Rsom and check the result for "no response" lines? Unfortunately this
still does not show which tag is actually "sleeping".
000 R04:TEST.BO01 N -01 031 3F800000 008B:080A
Scanning 0225 L N -01 -1 0408 01C2
Time Stamp: Not Available
001 R01:P_MODULE_NEW.BO0005 N -01 003 3F800000 005F:FE1A
Scanning 0225 L N -01 -1 0369 065E
Time Stamp: Not Available
002 R02:P_MODULE_NEW.BO0005 N -01 004 3F800000 0064:4786
Scanning 0225 L N -01 -1 047F 065E
Time Stamp: Not Available
003 R03:P_MODULE_NEW.BO0005 N -01 005 3F800000 0068:82B6
Scanning 0225 L N -01 -1 0480 065E
Time Stamp: Not Available
004 R05:P_MODULE_NEW.BO0005 N -01 007 3F800000 006F:48A2
Scanning 0225 L N -01 -1 0482 065E
Time Stamp: Not Available
005 R06:P_MODULE_NEW.BO0005 N -01 008 3F800000 0072:A8EA
Scanning 0225 L N -01 -1 03FF 065E
Time Stamp: Not Available
006 VACUUM_R:R4_V_062PVO.OUT N -01 032 3F800000 0052:C838
Scanning 0023 L N -01 -1 00000000 0184 024C
Time Stamp: Not Available
007 FREKW_R:PREMELTERFAN.OUT N -01 033 3A83126F 0077:6CEC
Scanning 0023 L N -01 -1 42100000 0433 024C
Time Stamp: Not Available
008 N -03 000 00000000 0000:0000
No Response 0000 L N -01 -1 0000 0000
Time Stamp: Not Available
Rgds,
Dirk
Kevin Fitzgerrell <fitzgerrell@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
06/09/2010 15:35
Please respond to
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
cc
Subject
Re: [foxboro] P2P links locked
Do you have a copy of the rsom output showing the error? As long as you
know what you're looking for, rsom is not that hard to script. We do it
to
monitor IPC sink and source totals (as opposed to the accumulated total of
both).
Cheers,
Kevin
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 10:30 PM, <dirk.pauwels@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
> No, unfortunately the point looked ok. At first glance we thought
> everything was ok, until we noticed the input in the target block did
not
> respond to the output of the source. We ran DBVU on both CP's involved
and
> found no unresolved or missing links or any other errors. When The
> Invensys engineer ran an Rsom - opdb he noticed the compound:block link
> reference was missing in the source CP list, with an error on the last
> line of the oprv list, probably representing the bad link.
>
> Rgds,
>
> Dirk
>
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
