Hey Nick, I must admit I'm a few years out of the loop, having left Foxboro in 2008, but I was there during the uproarious days after Solaris EOL was announced. Terry Deo was one of the leading customers advocating for a solution and we created a team (including Daren) to work with him. I cannot speak to the roadmap anymore or what they are building into InBatch today, but I know Terry would be one of the customers with the most knowledge of your options and the pros and cons of each since he helped us to build it. It's a bit hard for me to answer your question directly without knowing how much you change the recipes that you presently use and how much you would anticipate doing so in the future. It'd also be valuable to understand how you are viewing them in operations, since I personally liked the interface of InBatch and would lean toward native applications. That's just me though, a guy who never spent much time on RBatch, and is a fan of those sexy Wonderware screens. Best regards, _____________________________ Joe Schipani Business Unit Manager 16055 Space Center Blvd. Houston, Tx 77062 MOBILE: +1.281.728.7316 (primary) DIRECT: +1.281.204.0870 eMail: jschipani@xxxxxxx http://www.pas.com Get Skype and call me for free. -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steinbrecher, Nick Sent: Friday, November 19, 2010 3:58 PM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [foxboro] Moving forward from Rbatch Dear Fellow Rbatchers, We run Rbatch in the newest Solaris stations also. Works fine. But I have a bigger question. What do you do when the Solaris stations go to lifetime? Not too far away, mid 2012? Our plan is to leap from Rbatch to INBatch. We are currently planning for that eventuality and looking at several options. In order of preference Translate recipes with the work that Daren is doing and build an INBatch to sequence block interface so we don't have to re-write our sequence logic to deal with the differences between Rbatch and INBatch. Re enter our recipes ( conversion process has some drawbacks at this point in terms of recipe display) and still get an interface program to keep from having to modify sequence logic. Rewrite sequence code and re-enter all our recipes (last and most painful option) Anybody have any other ideas? >Nick Steinbrecher > -----Original Message----- From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of andreas.weiss@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2010 10:31 AM To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [foxboro] Rbatch on a P81 Dear friends, thanks a lot for the help! Regards, Andreas _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave