Yes, we recommend cached mode. It greatly improves the user experience, in my opinion. If an OST corrupts, delete it and recreate. That is one of the great things about cached mode -- it still all exists on a reliable backed up server. -----Original Message----- From: Danny [mailto:nocmonkey@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 8:52 PM To: [ExchangeList] Subject: [exchangelist] Re: Email Hosting Services http://www.MSExchange.org/ On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:02:26 -0500, Michael B. Smith <michael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > http://www.MSExchange.org/ > > Outlook 2003 in cached mode alleviates much of this concern. Good point. So, you recommend to your clients to always run in cached mode? What about local OST corruption and the like? ...D ------------------------------------------------------ List Archives: http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Exchange Newsletters: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/newsletter.asp Exchange FAQ: http://www.msexchange.org/pages/larticle.asp?type=FAQ ------------------------------------------------------ Other Internet Software Marketing Sites: World of Windows Networking: http://www.windowsnetworking.com Leading Network Software Directory: http://www.serverfiles.com No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: http://www.isaserver.org Windows Security Resource Site: http://www.windowsecurity.com/ Network Security Library: http://www.secinf.net/ Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions: http://www.ntfaxfaq.com ------------------------------------------------------ You are currently subscribed to this MSEXchange.org Discussion List as: michael@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit http://www.webelists.com/cgi/lyris.pl?enter=exchangelist Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
