Re: Email Hosting Services

  • From: "Michael B. Smith" <michael@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "[ExchangeList]" <exchangelist@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:07:48 -0500

Yes, we recommend cached mode. It greatly improves the user experience,
in my opinion.

If an OST corrupts, delete it and recreate. That is one of the great
things about cached mode -- it still all exists on a reliable backed up

-----Original Message-----
From: Danny [mailto:nocmonkey@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 8:52 PM
To: [ExchangeList]
Subject: [exchangelist] Re: Email Hosting Services

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:02:26 -0500, Michael B. Smith
<michael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Outlook 2003 in cached mode alleviates much of this concern.

Good point. So, you recommend to your clients to always run in cached

What about local OST corruption and the like?


List Archives:
Exchange Newsletters:
Exchange FAQ:
Other Internet Software Marketing Sites:
World of Windows Networking: Leading
Network Software Directory:
No.1 ISA Server Resource Site: Windows Security
Resource Site: Network Security Library: Windows 2000/NT Fax Solutions:
You are currently subscribed to this Discussion List as:
michael@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe visit
Report abuse to listadmin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: