However, there are specific rules BANA has set forth for special typefaces that take all this into account, and so following those rules removes their overuse in braille. If w/ would confuse the reader or misrepresent the contents of the menu, I would agree with you, but it neither detracts from, nor confuses, the subject matter. Bruce On Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:16:39 -0500, "Steve Dresser" <s.dresser@xxxxxxxxxxx> said: > > > Ann, > > You're absolutely right. The argument that braille should exactly follow > print is fatuous at best. A case in point is the use of "w/" for "with". > In print, "w/" makes sense as a kind of shorthand, but in braille there > is > already a contraction for the word, and it's far more efficient than the > print shorthand. Many things are done in print to produce a certain > visual > effect, such as bolding and italics. In braille, such things are often > more > distracting than anything else. > > Steve > -- Bruce Toews dogriver@xxxxxxxx * * * * This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org. * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with * unsubscribe * as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive * is also located there. * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com * * *