Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2014 10:45:50 +0200
a blind monkey could.
Brady is 1 below that.
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Well if they just resist the tendency to be utter fucktards and keep
> broken shit like kabal out of the game there won't be any need for
> baby game mechanics to try and hide their shoddy balancing.
>
> We as a group could balance games better than nrs.
>
> On 13/06/2014, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Not sure how much it'll nulify. But at least they're trying to get rid of
> > all those insane pressure like Kabal's b+1~nomad rush chip BS.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Stephen Scheidel <
> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> So they are just giving noobs a chance to escape.
> >> Devs are really trying to make games purely a rock paper scissor thing.
> >>
> >> What's the point of a tough situation if you can just nullify it with
> >> some noob feature.
> >>
> >> On 12/06/2014, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> > Let's put it this way. The movement is basically the same as MK9. But
> >> > now
> >> > they added a new metere called "agility bar" where you can use it to
> do
> >> > full/half screen run and do an evasive spacing backdash (i'm not sure
> >> > if
> >> > normal backdashing will consume such meter/bar...) So if you had 0
> >> problem
> >> > with movement in mk9. mkx agility bar shouldn't cause you any trouble
> >> > for
> >> > your own movement. I see it as an escape mechanism more than
> offensive.
> >> > because you need agility meter to use interactables and "evasive"
> >> backdash.
> >> > the backdash range is big enough to punish wiff. so it SHOULD cause
> >> > bar.
> >> if
> >> > the normal backdash already does that, then no need to use agility
> bar.
> >> >
> >> > It doesn't take away anything. It's adding more escape mechanism for
> >> people
> >> > who have a tough time with rushdown characters up on their face...
> >> >
> >> > Also the meter recovers really quickly (like 1-2 sec for full 2 bars?
> >> dunno
> >> > will check again...might be faster)...so it's not like you'll not be
> >> > able
> >> > to use it every now and then. But if you abuse the meter...then you'll
> >> pay
> >> > for it when you really need it. The bars are there so you don't just
> >> abuse
> >> > the agility bar backdash and jump off walls all the time with no
> >> > consequences.
> >> >
> >> > We don't know how's the recovery on the agility bar either. If it's
> >> > good
> >> > then it should cost bars...if it's crap then no.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >> > <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I used the run button all the time.
> >> >> On 12 Jun 2014 16:38, "Donaldson, Alasdair"
> >> >> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Did you ever use the run button in MK3? I think I used it when
> >> trolling
> >> >>> with Cyrax and his grab into stuff, or with one of old SubZero’s
> >> combos…
> >> >>> not much else.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> It will be interesting seeing how this changes the oki game.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I actually thought the movement in MK9 was fine. I mean for general
> >> play
> >> >>> between us (non Kabal/Kenshi matches). Felt smooth enough.
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >>> *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
> >> >>> *Sent:* 12 June 2014 4:32 PM
> >> >>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> You can use bar for teleport stuff in kof. Most of it is last dich
> >> >>> when
> >> >>> I
> >> >>> use it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 12 Jun 2014 16:28, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
> >> >>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Don't you need meter for some of the movement stuff in KOF? I mean
> >> >>> the
> >> >>> rolls?
> >> >>> Who knows how this is going to work? I presume the backdashing will
> >> >>> be
> >> >>> enough to clear the space and either give you the opportunity to
> >> >>> whiff
> >> >>> punish or set up some zoning stuff.
> >> >>> This is MK... they've never had proper backdashes before. They're
> now
> >> >>> adding new movement and people are still complaining that this will
> >> >>> reduce
> >> >>> their ability to play the game? How?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >> >>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
> >> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> >> >>> On Behalf Of Manase Zote
> >> >>> Sent: 12 June 2014 4:22 PM
> >> >>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >>>
> >> >>> In other games we can backlash until the cows come home and there is
> >> >>> no
> >> >>> meter for that and the game is still fair nothing broken about the
> >> >>> mechanic. lol In street fighter if you backdash non stop you corner
> >> >>> yourself and that alone is bad so I still don't understand why you
> >> would
> >> >>> need meter in helping with your suicide(cornering yourself).
> >> >>> My suggestion is just balance the back dash so that it's not OP(like
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> SF, KOF and other 2D fighters).
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>> > The "agility bar" backdash covers much more distance than that i
> >> >>> > think.
> >> >>> > Also, if we can just backdash nonstop and avoid normals and
> >> >>> > strings...rushdown/pressure characters will have problem, because
> >> >>> > they'll just backdash and avoid everything all the time.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > Unless they make backdashing more technical like Tekken. I think
> >> >>> > the
> >> >>> > agility bar is fair. It doesn't limit anything at all. It helps
> >> >>> > with
> >> >>> > tough situation.
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> MK9 didn't have a bar for back dashing and it was just fine so
> >> >>> >> what
> >> >>> >> was wrong with that?
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> > The movement and pace of the game seems to be the same as mk9
> >> >>> >> > (which i think is ok but not the best). The agility bar
> enhances
> >> >>> >> > that a lot more for
> >> >>> >> > 1-2
> >> >>> >> > bars. So i don't mind it. It doesn't limit the movement of game
> >> >>> >> > at
> >> >>> all.
> >> >>> >> > Eg.
> >> >>> >> > Tekken movement but you can do a "super" backdash for 1 agility
> >> bar
> >> >>> >> > (that fills up on it's own pretty nicely) to get out of Nina's
> >> df+1
> >> >>> >> > ss+1 pressure...or spend 2 agility bars to avoid nina's df+1
> >> >>> >> > ss+1
> >> >>> >> > pressure by using stage interactables and jump away. Not sure
> if
> >> >>> >> > you're invincible or not during the jump...What was injustice
> >> like?
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > So the basic movements is there. No limitation at all. Agility
> >> >>> >> > bar
> >> >>> >> > helps but doesn't defy the whole movement gameplay.
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Manase Zote <
> bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> At this point no one knows how all of the above system
> >> >>> >> >> mechanics
> >> >>> >> >> are going to turn out.
> >> >>> >> >> Limiting movement to a bar is a crime in any fighting game
> >> because
> >> >>> >> >> you need movement for everything you do in a fighting game.
> >> >>> >> >> It also affects the pacing of the overall match. So for me
> >> >>> >> >> limiting movement to a bar is a gimmick and will only give
> >> players
> >> >>> >> >> more problems rather than assisting them in a match.
> >> >>> >> >> I still don't see how styles can solve bad match ups, zoner
> >> >>> >> >> will
> >> >>> >> >> always have an advantage from range, rushdown owns up-close...
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> > There's an agility bar. New bar. Nothing to do with EX bar.
> >> >>> >> >> > It
> >> >>> >> >> > fills up pretty quickly. There's 2 bar. You use 1 to perform
> >> run
> >> >>> >> >> > or a backdash (spaces out quite a bit). I think this is
> fair.
> >> It
> >> >>> >> >> > fills up fast enough to use it every now and then. But not
> >> >>> >> >> > enough to just spam nonstop. You use
> >> >>> >> >> > 2 to
> >> >>> >> >> > use stage interactables. So it's not a stage
> interactablefest
> >> >>> >> >> > like Injustice. You have to decide if it'll be worth it to
> >> >>> >> >> > use
> >> >>> >> >> > interactables or to just dash up to continue pressure / dash
> >> >>> >> >> > away to keep zoning.
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > As for variation. It's like saying Catwomen decides to do
> >> >>> rushdown.
> >> >>> >> >> > And
> >> >>> >> >> > Grundy decides to do "zoning" with his zombie ground grab
> >> thingy
> >> >>> >> >> > (meaning he'll not have his armor chainthrows etc.) Catwomen
> >> >>> >> >> > will just run up to grundy with her claw slash and ignore
> >> >>> >> >> > most
> >> >>> >> >> > of Grundy's zoning. I'm hoping the character variation is
> NOT
> >> >>> >> >> > going to be rock/paper/scissors. Hope it helps you with
> >> >>> >> >> > really
> >> >>> >> >> > bad match up, but still at the end of the day...it's what
> you
> >> >>> >> >> > do. Because in MK9, i can just spam Kabal's instant air
> >> fireball
> >> >>> >> >> > like a noob and know some combos and it'll already be hard
> to
> >> >>> >> >> > win against kabal without having to learn his advance nomad
> >> dash
> >> >>> >> >> > cancels if you play someone who has trouble with zoning.
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > so instead of choosing a variation and giving you instant
> win
> >> >>> >> >> > (because you only keep a few moveset between variations).
> i'm
> >> >>> >> >> > hoping variation helps with really bad match ups like 9-1 or
> >> 8-2
> >> >>> >> >> > to something like 6-4 or 5-5 and what not. because fighting
> >> >>> >> >> > games should be about what you can do as a player.
> >> >>> >> >> > just because i know stupid spamming basic kabal shouldn't
> >> >>> >> >> > give
> >> >>> >> >> > me instant advantage over someone who's really good with
> >> sheeva,
> >> >>> >> >> > scorpion or sub zero (don't know which characters have issue
> >> >>> >> >> > with zoning in mk9...)
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Manase Zote <
> >> bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> SAP just told me that you need meter to run?
> >> >>> >> >> >> Isn't that supposed to be stone age mechanics(having a
> meter
> >> >>> >> >> >> for running)?
> >> >>> >> >> >> Who said running was broken?
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> *Sigh*
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> Back in MK3/UMK3/MK4 that meter also managed your combos so
> >> >>> >> >> >> no
> >> >>> >> >> >> meter no chain combos no running around :(
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Wynand-Ben
> >> >>> >> >> >> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Im also not seeing how it can help bad matchups.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Picking a different version of the same character or a
> >> >>> >> >> >> > different character all together between matches would be
> >> >>> >> >> >> > just like it was now.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> > Counterpicking etc.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 15:11:20 +0200
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> How do you get around the rock/paper/scissors character
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> selection?
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Player 1 picks his zoning scorpion while player 2 goes
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> for
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> rush down version of scorpion, it will still be a bad
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> match
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> up for one of the guys regardless.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Tools of the characters, match-up exp and lastly the
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> skill
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> level and execution will be the deciding factor.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> To me the understanding of a balance fighting is to make
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> every character the same...
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:54 PM, Di Lhong <
> >> numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Hmmm a good fighting game shouldn't be all about bad
> >> match
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > up and lack of knowledge...it should still be fun and
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > challenging in another level when your opponent knows
> >> what
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > your character can do.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Yes there are bad match ups and character knowledge in
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > fighting games.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > but
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > it shouldn't be in a state of "i know what you're
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > doing,
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > but i can't retaliate at all"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > Eg. Tekken. Capos. If my opponent knows how to deal
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > with
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > relax stance and such. I'll play in another mode :)
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > There
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > is no "instant" win in tekken.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > you
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > can play bears and still win against top tier
> character
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > because you the player are just better. shouldn't be
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > bringing a plastic ruler to a gun fight situation.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > should
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > be more or less "experienced fighter with a slightly
> >> blunt
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > knife" vs "an okay-ish fighter with a sharp knife".
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Manase Zote
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> This method of balancing looks like a throw of dice
> to
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> me.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> It can go either way, you potentially have a scenario
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> where you can lose a match based on lack of character
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> knowledge rather than skill.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> If the game has like 30 characters for an example
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> multiply that by 3 so on average you need to be aware
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> of
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> what all 90 variations are capable of?
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Let's wait and see what the move list looks like and
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> how
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> many moves will change between 3 variations of a
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> character.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Di Lhong
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > 11.59? XD
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > Hopefully the character variation will be some
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > answer
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > to really bad match up. Not sure how they'll
> balance
> >> it
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > tho. It'll be weird to just be a total counter to
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > another characters variation completely. If that's
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > the
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > case, it'll be more rock paper scissors situation
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > than
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > a fighting game lolz hopefully the variations will
> >> make
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > match ups like 9-1 to 6-4 or what not. So there'll
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > still be unfavourable match ups but not a complete
> >> lose
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > like MK9...eg. Kabal vs Sheeva...
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:27 PM, Ryan Williams
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think 12:00 is a safer option Rich :)
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 2:24 PM,
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Is 11:30 fine also?? I wanna get game time as
> much
> >> as
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> I can Sent via my BlackBerry from Vodacom - let
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> your
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> email find you!
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> ________________________________
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Sender: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:15:48 +0200
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> To: <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> ReplyTo: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Heya peeps, we'll be starting the Sat sessions at
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> 12pm to maximise game time.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Anyone who is keen on starting a little earlier
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> can
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> join us at that time.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> If you aren't able to make 12pm, that's fine as
> >> well.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Ashraf Barendse
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> I think she feeling a bit lazy today. She was
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> like
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> "Can I speak to the main owner of the computer"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> and
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> I was like "he's at work"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> and
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> she
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> was
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> like
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> "k thanx bye"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Nicholas
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>> Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> I love those.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Start talking linux, usually goes well.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "move to your start bar"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "don't have one"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "what version of Windows are you using"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "I'm not using Windows"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "Open up Internet Explorer"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "don't have that either"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "open your web browser"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "mkay"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "install this app"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "using my regular tar.z loader or the synaptic
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> package manage?"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> "huh?"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> good times.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Ashraf
> Barendse
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> lol, got a call from an Indian sounding lady
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> calling from "Windows Technical Department"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> How about no.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Ryan Williams
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> "Can I just buy a complete game please?"
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Not going to happen in this day and age.
> Those
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> days are over.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Nicholas
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> LOL
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I don't know which I hate more about
> fighting
> >> >>> games.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> The
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> update
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> approach like Street Fighter, or the
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> supposedly
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> new game like Blazblue and Persona.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> It makes me not want to buy the games
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> anymore,
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> because there will be an Update later.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Can I just buy a complete game please?
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Persona now?
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Do I need to buy another Blazblue now?
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> I'm just ranting because I see there's a new
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> character coming out for P4A ...and I was
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> planning to get the new Blazblue (english
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> version)...
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> In all honesty, the Capcom approach makes
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> more
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> sense to me, as much as I dislike it.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Wynand-Ben
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> A new dark age starting off with a new
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Guilty
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Gear I can definitely live with :D
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 11:59:23 +0200
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > I'm all for the next FG dark age.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Wreal wrap.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > On 12/06/2014, Ilitirit Sama
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > > Mortal Kombat Honest Trailer:
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >
> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OCiVYKmCveY
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> =============================================
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > ============================ You are
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > Community mailing list.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> > //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> =========================================================
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> ================ You are subscribed to the Cape Town
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> Fighting Game Community mailing list.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> ============================================================
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> ============= You are subscribed to the Cape Town
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Fighting
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> Game Community mailing list.
> >> >>> >> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> ===============================================================
> >> >>> >> >> >> ========== You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting
> Game
> >> >>> >> >> >> Community mailing list.
> >> >>> >> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >> >
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> ==================================================================
> >> >>> >> >> ======= You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
> >> >>> >> >> Community mailing list.
> >> >>> >> >>
> >> >>> >> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >> >
> >> >>> >>
> >> =====================================================================
> >> >>> >> ==== You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community
> >> >>> >> mailing list.
> >> >>> >>
> >> >>> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >> >>> >
> >> >>> >
> >> >>>
> >>
> =========================================================================
> >> >>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
> >> >>> list.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> **********************************************************************
> >> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >> >>> e-mail
> >> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
> >> >>> communication
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> >> send
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies
> of
> >> >>> it.
> >> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> >> >>> on
> >> >>> it,
> >> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> this
> >> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >> >>> governing
> >> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >> >>> information
> >> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the
> official
> >> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >> >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
> >> >>> lost,
> >> >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
> ("KPMG
> >> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >> >>> services
> >> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> >> >>> Swiss
> >> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> >> independent
> >> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> >> legally
> >> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >> >>> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG
> >> >>> member
> >> >>> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
> >> >>> by
> >> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ------------------------------
> >> >>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> >> >>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
> >> >>> e-mail
> >> >>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
> >> >>> communication
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
> >> send
> >> >>> to
> >> >>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies
> of
> >> >>> it.
> >> >>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> >> >>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance
> >> >>> on
> >> >>> it,
> >> >>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained
> >> >>> in
> >> >>> this
> >> >>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the
> >> >>> governing
> >> >>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other
> >> >>> information
> >> >>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the
> official
> >> >>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
> >> >>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended,
> >> >>> lost,
> >> >>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
> ("KPMG
> >> >>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
> >> >>> services
> >> >>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
> >> Swiss
> >> >>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
> >> independent
> >> >>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> >> >>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a
> >> legally
> >> >>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> >> >>> Information
> >> >>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm
> >> >>> can
> >> >>> be
> >> >>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
> >> >>> by
> >> >>> AntiVirus software.
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing
> list.
> >>
> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >>
> >
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
Other related posts:
