"Hawkins, Jane M" <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > While we've hosted it for free before, I also heard (since I missed > the Clemson one, having a conflicting meeting) that there's an NSF > "template" we might use if we want to try for funding again. > > While I do not want to interfere into the discussion about the next location for the CDS meeting I would like to say a sentence or two about the NSF funding. I am not very experienced in obtaining NSF funding comparing to the other members of Carolina Dynamical System group but my feeling is that the group should apply this year for tree year funding instead of one year. The upshot of getting three year support will be that the group will not have to go through the process of writing grant proposal next year again. Secondly, my feeling is that having multiple co-pi(s) on the grant proposal from the ranks of the long terms members of the group and potential organizers of the next 3 meetings will increase group's chances to re-new funding. Co-pi(s) role in the writing this specific grant proposal is simple and not very time consuming. It boils down to submitting NSF Biography and a support letter. This will also demonstrate to NSF the fact that CDS meeting is a multi-university effort. Most Kind Regards, Predrag Punosevac