[cdynsys] Re: 2013 meeting of the Carolina Dynamics Seminar
- From: "Petersen, Karl E" <petersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "cdynsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <cdynsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 00:23:28 +0000
Dear Predrag,
These are very wise and helpful comments.
Best, --Karl
-----Original Message-----
From: cdynsys-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cdynsys-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Predrag Punosevac
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2012 8:17 PM
To: cdynsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cdynsys] Re: 2013 meeting of the Carolina Dynamics Seminar
"Hawkins, Jane M" <jmh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> While we've hosted it for free before, I also heard (since I missed
> the Clemson one, having a conflicting meeting) that there's an NSF
> "template" we might use if we want to try for funding again.
>
>
While I do not want to interfere into the discussion about the next location
for the CDS meeting I would like to say a sentence or two about the NSF funding.
I am not very experienced in obtaining NSF funding comparing to the other
members of Carolina Dynamical System group but my feeling is that the group
should apply this year for tree year funding instead of one year. The upshot of
getting three year support will be that the group will not have to go through
the process of writing grant proposal next year again.
Secondly, my feeling is that having multiple co-pi(s) on the grant proposal
from the ranks of the long terms members of the group and potential organizers
of the next 3 meetings will increase group's chances to re-new funding.
Co-pi(s) role in the writing this specific grant proposal is simple and not
very time consuming. It boils down to submitting NSF Biography and a support
letter. This will also demonstrate to NSF the fact that CDS meeting is a
multi-university effort.
Most Kind Regards,
Predrag Punosevac
Other related posts:
